Warning: include(domaintitles/domaintitle_cdn.exoticindia.php3): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 921

Warning: include(): Failed opening 'domaintitles/domaintitle_cdn.exoticindia.php3' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 921

Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address [email protected].

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Sign In  |  Sign up
Your Cart (0)
Best Deals
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > Hindu > Brahma Sutras > Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa
Subscribe to our newsletter and discounts
Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa
Pages from the book
Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa
Look Inside the Book
Description
PREFACE

Sankaradarsana is an evergreen philosophy and theology which is discussed widely. It is a living tradition having great followers. This work titled, Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa, is primarily a critique on Sankara and it looks into the problem of sudra-exclusion by analysing Apasudradhikaranam of Brahmasiara Sankara Bhasya. With the insights received, it tries to make an advaitic response to the problem of exclusion which has become a threat to the well-being and integrity of the society.

This work is my doctoral dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Philosophy, Jnana-Deepa Vidyapeeth (Pontifical Institute of Philosophy and Religion, Pune), defended on July 28,2017 for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy (Ph D). With a joyful heart I thank God, the Almighty who has been my light in the task of this research. It was He who enabled and availed me with all the necessary help in various ways, especially by providing me with persons who were generous to support me.

I consider it to be providential and great blessing to have Dr. John Peter Vallabadoss OFM Cap. as my guide. I express my sincere gratitude and profound appreciation for his scholarly guidance, honest critique and insightful suggestions. It was his availability with a joyful spirit and encouragement with a brotherly concern that kept my enthusiasm untiring.

I am thankful to Dr. Selva Rethinam, SJ, the president of Jnana-Deepa Vidyapeeth (JDV) Pune, and Dr. Kuruvilla Pandikattu, SJ, the Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy, for their encouragement. I am grateful to Dr. Nishant A. Irudayadason, who always extended his wholehearted support at every stage of this work in his capacity as the Chair Person for the Doctoral Committee of the Faculty of Philosophy.

At this moment, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Rev. Dr. Raphie Paliakkara OFM Cap., the former Provincial Minister of St. Thomas Capuchin Province, Kerala, to which I belong. It was he, in consultation with his councilors, who suggested me to have this research and made all the necessary arrangements. I am greatful to Rev. Fr. Pauly Madassery, the present Provincial Minister, who with all his blessings supported and encouraged me to get this work published.

I thankfully remember Dr. Stephan Chundanthadathil, SJ, Dr. Henry D' Almeida, SJ, Dr. Sebastian Pynadath, SJ, Dr. Kancha Ilaiah, Dr. Jose Thachil, Dr. Johnson Puthenpurackal OFM Cap., Dr. George Pattery, SJ, Dr. Anto Cheramthuruthy, Dr. P.T. Mathew, SJ, Dr. Yesudas Karunanidhi, Fr. Antony Thekkinieth OFM Cap. and Dr. Jijo Kurian OFM Cap. for spending their precious time for me with discussions at various stages of this project, and for their help in finding out the needed resources.

With heartfelt gratitude I remember Fr. Vincent Crasta, SJ, the registrar of JDV and the moderator of JDV PG Block, Fr. Alex, SJ, the administrator of JDV and Dr. Francis Ezhakunnel, the former moderator of PG Block, for their encouragement and support for my stay and study in IDV. I take this opportunity to gratefully acknowledge the scholarship provided by Missio, which supported me financially.

I gratefully remember the generous service rendered to me by Dr. Thomas Reddy, SJ and Dr. Biju Joseph, SJ, the librarians of JDV, and other library-staff.

INTRODUCTION

Brahmajijnasa, the quest for Brahman, which is the desire and search for self-realisation, is very fundamental to Advaitic tradition. In satiating this quest Vedas are considered as the excellent recourse by the entire Vedic tradition. On the basis of varna and asrama, Vedas and the religious tradition related to it disqualify and exclude some groups of people, such as sudras, women of all varnas, non-sannyasa asramis, and those who do not belong to any asrama such as widower, from this quest. This idea of exclusion is fostered by the subsequent texts of the tradition such as Manusmrti. It is carried over to the succeeding age of the Vedic tradition reaching up to the time of Vedanta. Sankara, the great Vedantic philosopher and theologian, also seems not an exception to this.

Apasudrudhikaranam of his Brahmasutra Bhasya argues for the exclusion of sudras. This dissertation attempts for a critical account of the problem of exclusion in Sankara.

Sankara: The Vedantic Thinker There were various attempts to understand the Upanisadic truth with the help of Bhagavadgita and Brahmasutra in addition to Upanisads. These attempts were in the form of interpretations given to these texts. Various philosophical or theological developments based on such interpretations are generally known as Vedantic systems. Sankara interpreted the Upanisadic wisdom from the standpoint of strict non-dualism (a-dvaita). Ontologically Brahman is the essence and reality-giving cause of everything. This does not deny the plurality and differences experienced in the phenomenal world but uphold the transcendence of ultimate reality, Brahman. The enlightenment consists in the intuitive experience of this non-dual reality which comprises the realisation of the identity between Atman and Brahman. In order to have this realisation the aspirant has to take up jnanamarga, the sravana (listening), manana (reflection) and nididhyasana (contemplation) of scriptures. Using reason as a tool, the aspirant takes up the means for realising the ultimate reality, Brahman which is trans-rational and extra-textual.

Critiquing Sankara

A sound critique on Sankara invites our attention to some of the important points. Understanding the mind of Sankara is comparatively difficult. One of the reasons is, his textual works-except Upadesasahasri-are commentaries on the texts of Vedic tradition such as Upanisads, Bhagavadgita and Brahmasutra, and therefore, the reader may not find his own ideas systematically developed. Secondly, the vocabulary he uses are sometimes confusing, because he borrows terms from other known philosophical systems of his time, such as Samkhya and Mimamsa. Thirdly, many literary works are attributed to him. Some of them present Sankara inadequately and improperly. Due to all these, it is possible that the Advaita tradition after Sankara misrepresent him. A critique has to take this fact into account.

The study of Sankara has to be critical than sympathetic. The traditional reverence for Sankara, and the deified position he occupied in the Advaita lineage, shall not compromise or constrain the kinds of questions that might be addressed to him. The critique has to take note of the inconsistencies and weak points of Sankaravedantic system, not merely to find fault with it, but rather, to look for its potential to become more reasonable and meaningful so that it might adequately serve the integrity of the humanity and the world at large.

**Contents and Sample Pages**

















Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa

Item Code:
NAW598
Cover:
PAPERBACK
Edition:
2019
ISBN:
9788194011149
Language:
English
Size:
8.50 X 5.50 inch
Pages:
401
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 0.42 Kg
Price:
$35.00   Shipping Free
Look Inside the Book
Be the first to rate this product
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa
From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 898 times since 29th May, 2020
PREFACE

Sankaradarsana is an evergreen philosophy and theology which is discussed widely. It is a living tradition having great followers. This work titled, Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa, is primarily a critique on Sankara and it looks into the problem of sudra-exclusion by analysing Apasudradhikaranam of Brahmasiara Sankara Bhasya. With the insights received, it tries to make an advaitic response to the problem of exclusion which has become a threat to the well-being and integrity of the society.

This work is my doctoral dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Philosophy, Jnana-Deepa Vidyapeeth (Pontifical Institute of Philosophy and Religion, Pune), defended on July 28,2017 for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy (Ph D). With a joyful heart I thank God, the Almighty who has been my light in the task of this research. It was He who enabled and availed me with all the necessary help in various ways, especially by providing me with persons who were generous to support me.

I consider it to be providential and great blessing to have Dr. John Peter Vallabadoss OFM Cap. as my guide. I express my sincere gratitude and profound appreciation for his scholarly guidance, honest critique and insightful suggestions. It was his availability with a joyful spirit and encouragement with a brotherly concern that kept my enthusiasm untiring.

I am thankful to Dr. Selva Rethinam, SJ, the president of Jnana-Deepa Vidyapeeth (JDV) Pune, and Dr. Kuruvilla Pandikattu, SJ, the Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy, for their encouragement. I am grateful to Dr. Nishant A. Irudayadason, who always extended his wholehearted support at every stage of this work in his capacity as the Chair Person for the Doctoral Committee of the Faculty of Philosophy.

At this moment, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Rev. Dr. Raphie Paliakkara OFM Cap., the former Provincial Minister of St. Thomas Capuchin Province, Kerala, to which I belong. It was he, in consultation with his councilors, who suggested me to have this research and made all the necessary arrangements. I am greatful to Rev. Fr. Pauly Madassery, the present Provincial Minister, who with all his blessings supported and encouraged me to get this work published.

I thankfully remember Dr. Stephan Chundanthadathil, SJ, Dr. Henry D' Almeida, SJ, Dr. Sebastian Pynadath, SJ, Dr. Kancha Ilaiah, Dr. Jose Thachil, Dr. Johnson Puthenpurackal OFM Cap., Dr. George Pattery, SJ, Dr. Anto Cheramthuruthy, Dr. P.T. Mathew, SJ, Dr. Yesudas Karunanidhi, Fr. Antony Thekkinieth OFM Cap. and Dr. Jijo Kurian OFM Cap. for spending their precious time for me with discussions at various stages of this project, and for their help in finding out the needed resources.

With heartfelt gratitude I remember Fr. Vincent Crasta, SJ, the registrar of JDV and the moderator of JDV PG Block, Fr. Alex, SJ, the administrator of JDV and Dr. Francis Ezhakunnel, the former moderator of PG Block, for their encouragement and support for my stay and study in IDV. I take this opportunity to gratefully acknowledge the scholarship provided by Missio, which supported me financially.

I gratefully remember the generous service rendered to me by Dr. Thomas Reddy, SJ and Dr. Biju Joseph, SJ, the librarians of JDV, and other library-staff.

INTRODUCTION

Brahmajijnasa, the quest for Brahman, which is the desire and search for self-realisation, is very fundamental to Advaitic tradition. In satiating this quest Vedas are considered as the excellent recourse by the entire Vedic tradition. On the basis of varna and asrama, Vedas and the religious tradition related to it disqualify and exclude some groups of people, such as sudras, women of all varnas, non-sannyasa asramis, and those who do not belong to any asrama such as widower, from this quest. This idea of exclusion is fostered by the subsequent texts of the tradition such as Manusmrti. It is carried over to the succeeding age of the Vedic tradition reaching up to the time of Vedanta. Sankara, the great Vedantic philosopher and theologian, also seems not an exception to this.

Apasudrudhikaranam of his Brahmasutra Bhasya argues for the exclusion of sudras. This dissertation attempts for a critical account of the problem of exclusion in Sankara.

Sankara: The Vedantic Thinker There were various attempts to understand the Upanisadic truth with the help of Bhagavadgita and Brahmasutra in addition to Upanisads. These attempts were in the form of interpretations given to these texts. Various philosophical or theological developments based on such interpretations are generally known as Vedantic systems. Sankara interpreted the Upanisadic wisdom from the standpoint of strict non-dualism (a-dvaita). Ontologically Brahman is the essence and reality-giving cause of everything. This does not deny the plurality and differences experienced in the phenomenal world but uphold the transcendence of ultimate reality, Brahman. The enlightenment consists in the intuitive experience of this non-dual reality which comprises the realisation of the identity between Atman and Brahman. In order to have this realisation the aspirant has to take up jnanamarga, the sravana (listening), manana (reflection) and nididhyasana (contemplation) of scriptures. Using reason as a tool, the aspirant takes up the means for realising the ultimate reality, Brahman which is trans-rational and extra-textual.

Critiquing Sankara

A sound critique on Sankara invites our attention to some of the important points. Understanding the mind of Sankara is comparatively difficult. One of the reasons is, his textual works-except Upadesasahasri-are commentaries on the texts of Vedic tradition such as Upanisads, Bhagavadgita and Brahmasutra, and therefore, the reader may not find his own ideas systematically developed. Secondly, the vocabulary he uses are sometimes confusing, because he borrows terms from other known philosophical systems of his time, such as Samkhya and Mimamsa. Thirdly, many literary works are attributed to him. Some of them present Sankara inadequately and improperly. Due to all these, it is possible that the Advaita tradition after Sankara misrepresent him. A critique has to take this fact into account.

The study of Sankara has to be critical than sympathetic. The traditional reverence for Sankara, and the deified position he occupied in the Advaita lineage, shall not compromise or constrain the kinds of questions that might be addressed to him. The critique has to take note of the inconsistencies and weak points of Sankaravedantic system, not merely to find fault with it, but rather, to look for its potential to become more reasonable and meaningful so that it might adequately serve the integrity of the humanity and the world at large.

**Contents and Sample Pages**

















Post a Comment
 
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Based on your browsing history
Loading... Please wait

Items Related to Exclusion of Sudras from Brahmajijnasa (Hindu | Books)

Brahmasutra with Vidyananda Vrtti (English Translation)
Item Code: NAH185
$52.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Catussutri - A Study of the First Four of the Brahmasutras
by V.R. Ganesan
Paperback (Edition: 2005)
The Samskrita Academy, Chennai
Item Code: NAL812
$16.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Brahman and Meditation: A Commentary on The Brahmasutras in Two Volumes
by Dr. Raghavendra Katti
Hardcover (Edition: 2013)
Dr. Raghavendra Katti
Item Code: NAL642
$95.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Testimonials
Thank you guys! I got the book! Your relentless effort to set this order right is much appreciated!!
Utpal, USA
You guys always provide the best customer care. Thank you so much for this.
Devin, USA
On the 4th of January I received the ordered Peacock Bell Lamps in excellent condition. Thank you very much. 
Alexander, Moscow
Gracias por todo, Parvati es preciosa, ya le he recibido.
Joan Carlos, Spain
We received the item in good shape without any damage. It is simply gorgeous. Look forward to more business with you. Thank you.
Sarabjit, USA
Your sculpture is truly beautiful and of inspiring quality!  I wish you continuous great success so that you may always be able to offer such beauty to all people throughout the world! Thank you for caring about your customers as well as the standard of your products.  It is extremely appreciated!! Sending you much love.
Deborah, USA
I’m glad you guys understand my side, well you guys have one of the best international store,  And I will probably continue being pleased costumer Thank you guys so much.
Renato, Brazil
I'm always so appreciative of Exotic India. You have such a terrific website, and great customer service. I wish you all the best, and hope you have a happy new year!
Eric, USA
A Statue was ordered on Dec 22nd and Paid 194.25 including FREE DELIVERY for me as a GIFT for Christmas and they Confirmed that it will be there in 4-5 days but it NEVER arrived till 30th of December and inspite of my various emails they only replied that it is being finished and will be shipped in 24hrs but that was a LIE and no further delivery information was every sent to me. I called and left a message on the phone number listed on their website which is a NY number but no one answered that phone and I left messages but no reply or update on my Statue was sent to me inspite of my daily emails to know the status. I still await this Statue but NO RESPONSIBLE REPLY.
Rita Wason
I got my order today. It was well packed and looks lovely.
Nirmaladevi, USA
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2021 © Exotic India