Warning: include(domaintitles/domaintitle_cdn.exoticindia.php3): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 751

Warning: include(): Failed opening 'domaintitles/domaintitle_cdn.exoticindia.php3' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/exotic/newexotic/header.php3 on line 751

Subscribe for Newsletters and Discounts
Be the first to receive our thoughtfully written
religious articles and product discounts.
Your interests (Optional)
This will help us make recommendations and send discounts and sale information at times.
By registering, you may receive account related information, our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
.
By subscribing, you will receive our email newsletters and product updates, no more than twice a month. All emails will be sent by Exotic India using the email address [email protected].

Please read our Privacy Policy for details.
|6
Sign In  |  Sign up
Your Cart (0)
Best Deals
Share our website with your friends.
Email this page to a friend
Books > Philosophy > Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders, and Predecessors)
Subscribe to our newsletter and discounts
Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders, and Predecessors)
Pages from the book
Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders, and Predecessors)
Look Inside the Book
Description
About the Book

How can philosophy accomplish the mission that Bhattacharyya evokes of modern India? In exploring answers to this fundamental question, Philosophy and India critically assesses the contributions of seven of the country’s leading twentieth-century academic philosophers— Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya, Akeel Bilgrami, B. K. Matilal, Daya Krishna, Satchidananda Murty, Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan—along with counterarguments posed by B. R. Ambedkar and T. R. V. Murti.

This work evaluates how Indian philosophers have reflected on the various aspects of modernity and colonialism, and have sought to address problems of modern Indian philosophy in the contexts of both classical Indian philosophy and modern Western philosophy.

It further delves into the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism, and the connotations derived from the epic Mahabharata, as articulated by modern Indian philosophers.

In the process, the book reveals the state of academic philosophy in India, and the nature of engagement of modern philosophers with their ancestors, ‘outsiders’, and their predecessors.

Providing unique and powerful insights into understanding the tension between the past and present, the modern and pre-modern, Indian texts and the Western enterprise of philosophy, the book reinvigorates the relationship between philosophy and India and facilitates the possibility of further discussion and debate in the area.

About the Author

A. Raghuramaraju is Professor at the Department of Philosophy, University of Hyderabad. He has published widely in the areas of social and political philosophy; Indian philosophy; postmodernism and post-colonialism; bio-ethics; and science, technology, and society. His book Debates in Indian Philosophy: Classical, Colonial, and Contemporary was selected as one of the Outstanding Academic Titles of 2007 by choice, a premier magazine for reviews of academic books and e-media.

Introduction

Rabindranath Tagore, a poet, was invited to deliver the inaugural Roresacniat address at the Indian Philosophical Congress. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, an Indian philosopher, internationally recognized for his work on the subject, was chosen as the President of India, the country’s highest office. The poet’s humble, wise, and fascinating address to the Congress has long been forgotten, and despite the global acclaim of Radhakrishnan, philosophy in India subsequently did not make a mark.

However, it is ‘in philosophy, if anywhere’, claims Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya,

that the task of discovering the soul of India is imperative for modern India; the task of achieving, if possible, the continuity of his old self with his present day self, of realising what is nowadays called the Mission of India, if it has any. Genius can unveil the soul of India in art but it is through philosophy that we can methodically attempt to discover it. (1984: 386-7)

So, philosophy is the terrain that can systematically explicate the soul of India. It is philosophy that can accomplish the mission that Bhattacharyya evokes of modern India. In Bhattacharyya’s reckoning, philosophy is not just another subject. It is she central mode of knowledge that can carry on its shoulders the tasks of civilization.

Notwithstanding its true capacity and assigned centrality, philosophy in modern India has not lived up to fulfilling this task.

Taking cognizance of this history, this book embarks on the project of critically assessing the contributions of some of the serious academic philosophers of India. The book is divided into three parts. Chapters 1 and 2 discuss the project of offering Indian solutions for Western problems. The first chapter analyses Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya’s offer of Advaita as a solution to the Kantian problem of the unknowability of the self. Unlike Gandhi, who sought for internal resources to deal with the problem of India and the West, Bhattacharyya traverses a path more akin to that of Bankim, Vivekananda, and Aurobindo. Without first seeking the solutions for Kant within the West, he offers solutions from India, or, more specifically, from Advaita. Similarly, Akeel Bilgrami, while discussing an entirely different problem, traverses the same path where he too without first seeking exemplars from the West, such as Socrates or Christ, offers Gandhi’s views of exemplar as a way out for solving the problems surrounding Western moral philosophy. In this context, I point out how their projects present an inverted version of colonial thematic. The colonial thematic, for instance, constructs India as a reservoir of problems and the West as a reservoir of solutions to those problems. The larger theoretical problem in these versions, the original colonial version and its inversion in Bhattacharyya and Bilgrami, persists in the underlying assumptions both make about the essentiality of East and West. I suggest an alternative binary, that lies between pre-modern and modern, which, being more inclusive and pluralistic, is closer to Gandhi than the East-West binary described earlier. The third chapter critiques the project of B. K. Matilal, who invests the epic Mahabharata with the task of incorporating ethics for Indian philosophy. This is problematic—while both Bhattacharyya and Bilgrami point out the limitations in Western philosophy and morality, Matilal strives to fill a lacuna in Indian philosophy, namely, that it does not include an ethical dimension. This chapter shows how the purview of ‘epic’ is greater than ‘ethics’ and Matilal’s offer falls short of a good bargain. One of the major surplus aspects of the epic is its capacity for regional access. In this context, the chapter discusses how the Mahabharata has, with the advent of modernity, entered the vernacular literatures, in disguise.

The second part has two chapters. The first chapter discusses the philosophical assumptions of the Samvada project undertaken by Daya Krishna and others. It lays bare the temporal imbalance underlying this project, that is, how this project tried to bring modern Western philosophy into dialogue with traditional Indian philosophy. The chapter argues that this imbalance is responsible for the failure of their project. The project failed because it recalled those classical texts that were sent on sabbatical with the arrival of modernity, and colonialism, in India. These texts, which largely inhabit a terrain comprising inequalities and hierarchies, are, with the entrance of egalitarian systems, not necessarily destroyed, but placed on sabbatical. Recalling these texts is bound to be counter- productive. The second chapter critically evaluates K. Satchidananda Murty’s assessment of the state of philosophy in Indian universities. Although Murty’s philosophical canvas is very wide, in his assessment of the state of philosophy in India, he fails to take into consideration the contributions from the sandhi period—the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This part of the book shows how both Daya Krishna and Satchidananda Murty are largely preoccupied with ancestors and outsiders and have grossly neglected their immediate predecessors. These predecessors, consisting of Vivekananda, Aurobindo, Gandhi, and others, seriously negotiated, with varying degrees of success, both ancestors and outsiders. This attempt by Gandhi and other nineteenth century contributions must be taken seriously and incorporated into any similar attempt to assess Indian philosophy in its current state.

**Contents and Sample Pages**








Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders, and Predecessors)

Item Code:
NAS228
Cover:
HARDCOVER
Edition:
2013
ISBN:
9780198092230
Language:
English
Size:
8.50 X 5.50 inch
Pages:
164
Other Details:
Weight of the Book: 0.31 Kg
Price:
$30.00   Shipping Free
Look Inside the Book
Add to Wishlist
Send as e-card
Send as free online greeting card
Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders, and Predecessors)

Verify the characters on the left

From:
Edit     
You will be informed as and when your card is viewed. Please note that your card will be active in the system for 30 days.

Viewed 56 times since 6th Aug, 2019
About the Book

How can philosophy accomplish the mission that Bhattacharyya evokes of modern India? In exploring answers to this fundamental question, Philosophy and India critically assesses the contributions of seven of the country’s leading twentieth-century academic philosophers— Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya, Akeel Bilgrami, B. K. Matilal, Daya Krishna, Satchidananda Murty, Ananda K. Coomaraswamy, and Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan—along with counterarguments posed by B. R. Ambedkar and T. R. V. Murti.

This work evaluates how Indian philosophers have reflected on the various aspects of modernity and colonialism, and have sought to address problems of modern Indian philosophy in the contexts of both classical Indian philosophy and modern Western philosophy.

It further delves into the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism, and the connotations derived from the epic Mahabharata, as articulated by modern Indian philosophers.

In the process, the book reveals the state of academic philosophy in India, and the nature of engagement of modern philosophers with their ancestors, ‘outsiders’, and their predecessors.

Providing unique and powerful insights into understanding the tension between the past and present, the modern and pre-modern, Indian texts and the Western enterprise of philosophy, the book reinvigorates the relationship between philosophy and India and facilitates the possibility of further discussion and debate in the area.

About the Author

A. Raghuramaraju is Professor at the Department of Philosophy, University of Hyderabad. He has published widely in the areas of social and political philosophy; Indian philosophy; postmodernism and post-colonialism; bio-ethics; and science, technology, and society. His book Debates in Indian Philosophy: Classical, Colonial, and Contemporary was selected as one of the Outstanding Academic Titles of 2007 by choice, a premier magazine for reviews of academic books and e-media.

Introduction

Rabindranath Tagore, a poet, was invited to deliver the inaugural Roresacniat address at the Indian Philosophical Congress. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, an Indian philosopher, internationally recognized for his work on the subject, was chosen as the President of India, the country’s highest office. The poet’s humble, wise, and fascinating address to the Congress has long been forgotten, and despite the global acclaim of Radhakrishnan, philosophy in India subsequently did not make a mark.

However, it is ‘in philosophy, if anywhere’, claims Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya,

that the task of discovering the soul of India is imperative for modern India; the task of achieving, if possible, the continuity of his old self with his present day self, of realising what is nowadays called the Mission of India, if it has any. Genius can unveil the soul of India in art but it is through philosophy that we can methodically attempt to discover it. (1984: 386-7)

So, philosophy is the terrain that can systematically explicate the soul of India. It is philosophy that can accomplish the mission that Bhattacharyya evokes of modern India. In Bhattacharyya’s reckoning, philosophy is not just another subject. It is she central mode of knowledge that can carry on its shoulders the tasks of civilization.

Notwithstanding its true capacity and assigned centrality, philosophy in modern India has not lived up to fulfilling this task.

Taking cognizance of this history, this book embarks on the project of critically assessing the contributions of some of the serious academic philosophers of India. The book is divided into three parts. Chapters 1 and 2 discuss the project of offering Indian solutions for Western problems. The first chapter analyses Krishna Chandra Bhattacharyya’s offer of Advaita as a solution to the Kantian problem of the unknowability of the self. Unlike Gandhi, who sought for internal resources to deal with the problem of India and the West, Bhattacharyya traverses a path more akin to that of Bankim, Vivekananda, and Aurobindo. Without first seeking the solutions for Kant within the West, he offers solutions from India, or, more specifically, from Advaita. Similarly, Akeel Bilgrami, while discussing an entirely different problem, traverses the same path where he too without first seeking exemplars from the West, such as Socrates or Christ, offers Gandhi’s views of exemplar as a way out for solving the problems surrounding Western moral philosophy. In this context, I point out how their projects present an inverted version of colonial thematic. The colonial thematic, for instance, constructs India as a reservoir of problems and the West as a reservoir of solutions to those problems. The larger theoretical problem in these versions, the original colonial version and its inversion in Bhattacharyya and Bilgrami, persists in the underlying assumptions both make about the essentiality of East and West. I suggest an alternative binary, that lies between pre-modern and modern, which, being more inclusive and pluralistic, is closer to Gandhi than the East-West binary described earlier. The third chapter critiques the project of B. K. Matilal, who invests the epic Mahabharata with the task of incorporating ethics for Indian philosophy. This is problematic—while both Bhattacharyya and Bilgrami point out the limitations in Western philosophy and morality, Matilal strives to fill a lacuna in Indian philosophy, namely, that it does not include an ethical dimension. This chapter shows how the purview of ‘epic’ is greater than ‘ethics’ and Matilal’s offer falls short of a good bargain. One of the major surplus aspects of the epic is its capacity for regional access. In this context, the chapter discusses how the Mahabharata has, with the advent of modernity, entered the vernacular literatures, in disguise.

The second part has two chapters. The first chapter discusses the philosophical assumptions of the Samvada project undertaken by Daya Krishna and others. It lays bare the temporal imbalance underlying this project, that is, how this project tried to bring modern Western philosophy into dialogue with traditional Indian philosophy. The chapter argues that this imbalance is responsible for the failure of their project. The project failed because it recalled those classical texts that were sent on sabbatical with the arrival of modernity, and colonialism, in India. These texts, which largely inhabit a terrain comprising inequalities and hierarchies, are, with the entrance of egalitarian systems, not necessarily destroyed, but placed on sabbatical. Recalling these texts is bound to be counter- productive. The second chapter critically evaluates K. Satchidananda Murty’s assessment of the state of philosophy in Indian universities. Although Murty’s philosophical canvas is very wide, in his assessment of the state of philosophy in India, he fails to take into consideration the contributions from the sandhi period—the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This part of the book shows how both Daya Krishna and Satchidananda Murty are largely preoccupied with ancestors and outsiders and have grossly neglected their immediate predecessors. These predecessors, consisting of Vivekananda, Aurobindo, Gandhi, and others, seriously negotiated, with varying degrees of success, both ancestors and outsiders. This attempt by Gandhi and other nineteenth century contributions must be taken seriously and incorporated into any similar attempt to assess Indian philosophy in its current state.

**Contents and Sample Pages**








Post a Comment
 
Post Review
Post a Query
For privacy concerns, please view our Privacy Policy
Based on your browsing history
Loading... Please wait

Items Related to Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders, and Predecessors) (Philosophy | Books)

Buddhist Philosophy in India and Ceylon
Item Code: IDG323
$30.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
An Introduction To Buddhist Philosophy in India and Tibet
by Zahiruddin Ahmad
Hardcover (Edition: 2007)
Aditya Prakashan
Item Code: IDK732
$65.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
The Inner Teachings of The Philosophy and Religion of India
by Yogi Ramacharaka
Hardcover (Edition: 2009)
Bharatiya Kala Prakashan
Item Code: NAI011
$35.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Against a Hindu God (Buddhist Philosophy of Religion in India)
Item Code: NAG090
$55.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Philosophy and India (Ancestors, Outsiders and Predecessors)
Item Code: NAL905
$25.00
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Development of Moral Philosophy in India
Deal 20% Off
Item Code: IRP17
$25.00$20.00
You save: $5.00 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Who's Who of Teachers and Scholars in Philosophy in India
Deal 20% Off
Item Code: IDH577
$5.50$4.40
You save: $1.10 (20%)
Add to Cart
Buy Now
Testimonials
I am so very grateful for the many outstanding and interesting books you have on offer.
Hans-Krishna, Canada
Appreciate your interest in selling the Vedantic books, including some rare books. Thanks for your service.
Dr. Swaminathan, USA
I received my order today, very happy with the purchase and thank you very much for the lord shiva greetings card.
Rajamani, USA
I have a couple of your statues in your work is really beautiful! Your selection of books and really everything else is just outstanding! Namaste, and many blessings.
Kimberly
Thank you once again for serving life.
Gil, USa
Beautiful work on the Ganesha statue I ordered. Prompt delivery. I would order from them again and recommend them.
Jeff Susman
Awesome books collection. lots of knowledge available on this website
Pankaj, USA
Very easy to do business with your company.
Paul Gomez, USA
Love you great selection of products including books and art. Of great help to me in my research.
William, USA
Thank you for your beautiful collection.
Mary, USA
Language:
Currency:
All rights reserved. Copyright 2019 © Exotic India