Contents | ||
Part One | ||
EARLY CHRISTIANITY | ||
Augustus Caesar and the Birth of Christ | 3 | |
The Historicity of Christ | 11 | |
"Born of a Womam" | 22 | |
Notes on Some Comments on "Born of a woman" | 33 | |
Did Jesus have Brothers and Sisters? | 40 | |
Christ's Kindom of God | 65 | |
The Shroud of Turin And the Biblical Evidence | 74 | |
The Time of Christ's Second Comingin the New Testament | 81 | |
St. Thomas and India | 94 | |
The friends of Paul - Luke and Mark | 97 | |
Did the Evangelist Luke Write Acts of the Apostles? | 115 | |
Part Two | ||
"RAISED FROM THE DEAD" | ||
Introduction : The Heart of the Problem | 135 | |
Section I | ||
1 | The Significance of the Earliest Evidence | 136 |
2 | The Reports of Appearances In the Gospels | 141 |
3 | How Far are the Gospels credible? | 143 |
4 | The Evidence of Paul | 154 |
5 | Paul's Preconceptions | 163 |
6 | The First Hurdle from Non- Pauline Scripture | 167 |
7 | The Credibility of Paul as against Acts | 170 |
8 | The Second and last Hurdle: | |
(a) Was an Empty Tomb Discovered? | 181 | |
(b) Was Joseph of Arimathaea Real? | 197 | |
(c) Was Jesus Tomb Known? | 212 | |
9 | Our Pailine Conclusions | 228 |
Section II | ||
1 | The Nature of the Appearances and some Clues From Sri Aurobndo | 238 |
2 | The Natureof the New Body in the light of Sri Aurobindo's Yogic Knowledge | 243 |
3 | The Pauline resurrection Seen Through Sri Aurobindo's Eyes | 2477 |
4 | Pauline Mysticism and the lead from it | 250 |
5 | The question of Immortality before the Resurrection | 253 |
6 | The true Sense of Resurrection in Paul | 259 |
7 | The Pauline Pneuma- Signpost to thesolution of our Problem | 266 |
8 | The Upshot of our Inquiry | 271 |
Contents | ||
Part One | ||
EARLY CHRISTIANITY | ||
Augustus Caesar and the Birth of Christ | 3 | |
The Historicity of Christ | 11 | |
"Born of a Womam" | 22 | |
Notes on Some Comments on "Born of a woman" | 33 | |
Did Jesus have Brothers and Sisters? | 40 | |
Christ's Kindom of God | 65 | |
The Shroud of Turin And the Biblical Evidence | 74 | |
The Time of Christ's Second Comingin the New Testament | 81 | |
St. Thomas and India | 94 | |
The friends of Paul - Luke and Mark | 97 | |
Did the Evangelist Luke Write Acts of the Apostles? | 115 | |
Part Two | ||
"RAISED FROM THE DEAD" | ||
Introduction : The Heart of the Problem | 135 | |
Section I | ||
1 | The Significance of the Earliest Evidence | 136 |
2 | The Reports of Appearances In the Gospels | 141 |
3 | How Far are the Gospels credible? | 143 |
4 | The Evidence of Paul | 154 |
5 | Paul's Preconceptions | 163 |
6 | The First Hurdle from Non- Pauline Scripture | 167 |
7 | The Credibility of Paul as against Acts | 170 |
8 | The Second and last Hurdle: | |
(a) Was an Empty Tomb Discovered? | 181 | |
(b) Was Joseph of Arimathaea Real? | 197 | |
(c) Was Jesus Tomb Known? | 212 | |
9 | Our Pailine Conclusions | 228 |
Section II | ||
1 | The Nature of the Appearances and some Clues From Sri Aurobndo | 238 |
2 | The Natureof the New Body in the light of Sri Aurobindo's Yogic Knowledge | 243 |
3 | The Pauline resurrection Seen Through Sri Aurobindo's Eyes | 2477 |
4 | Pauline Mysticism and the lead from it | 250 |
5 | The question of Immortality before the Resurrection | 253 |
6 | The true Sense of Resurrection in Paul | 259 |
7 | The Pauline Pneuma- Signpost to thesolution of our Problem | 266 |
8 | The Upshot of our Inquiry | 271 |